Why should gay marriage rights exist

Hardwickthe Supreme Court ruled that states could criminalize same-sex intimacy. If businesses are allowed to discriminate based on sexuality, who will be next? The Obergefell decision was viewed as a triumph for LGBTQ+ families. The U. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could overturn state bans on conversion therapypotentially reopening the door for a practice widely condemned by medical professionals.

But as we’ve seen in the recent rollbacks of hard-won rights, including the loss of the right to an abortion, in the Dobbs decision, legal wins can be fragile. LGBTQ+ individuals should not have to hide who they are, or limit themselves out of fear of violence or discrimination.

And yet, today those rights are under direct and coordinated attack at the highest levels of the past, LGBTQIA+ rights advocates have fought for - and won - major victories, from marriage equality and adoption rights to.

Why LGBTQIA Rights should

While the U. Under Executive Ordertransgender individuals are banned from serving in the military, a policy that had previously been reversed under the Biden administration. [55] The case was sent back to a lower court but voters approved a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage before the.

It took 17 years for that ruling to be overturned in Lawrence v. A workplace that rejects anti-gay harassment is more likely to reject racial or religious harassment as well. Texas United States v. The proposed Equality Act - which would provide nationwide, permanent protections - has been stalled in Congress for years.

It validated the right for same-sex couples to marry and access marriage rights in the eyes of the law. Windsor and Obergefell v. In multiple states, hospitals have begun halting gender-affirming care programs due to legal pressure, leaving trans individuals—including adults—without access to life-saving healthcare.

When we advocate for gay rights, we are advocating for the right to exist without fear of persecution or discrimination. History has shown us the harmful effects of such thinking. And yet, today those rights are under direct and coordinated attack at the highest levels of government.

There is no distinction, no debate, and no justification for stripping away the fundamental freedoms of queer American people. These wins were not granted; they were hard-fought through decades of activism, legal battles, and cultural change.

This means that someone can still be fired, evicted, or denied services just for being gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender. There is no distinction, no debate, and no justification for stripping away the fundamental freedoms of queer American people.

Executive Order prevents federal funding from supporting gender-affirming care for minors, labeling such treatment as "chemical and surgical mutilation. A society that respects same-sex marriages is one that values love and commitment in all its forms.

LGBTQIA+ rights are human rights. In Bowers v. Hodges legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, but some lawmakers are openly advocating for these decisions to be overturned. Executive Orderfor example, mandates that federal agencies define sex strictly as male or female based on reproductive biology, effectively erasing federal recognition of transgender and nonbinary identities.

But those rights are not guaranteed. Gay rights are essential for LGBTQ+ individuals to live fulfilling and authentic lives. Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?Gay Marriage Debate, The current national debate on gay marriage was sparked by the Supreme Court of Hawaii’s ruling on May 5, that the state could not ban same-sex marriages without “a compelling reason” to do so.

Why Same Sex Marriages

Why Same Sex Marriages Should Continue To Be Legal Larry R. Peterson Emeritus Professor NDSU History Department I want to address three reasons why same-sex marriages should continue to be legal in the United States: marriage as a basic human right, the relationship between law and religion, and the istory of marriage as a changin.

Instead, they exist in a fragile patchwork of court decisions, executive orders, and state laws - which can be revoked or overturned. When governments restrict rights based on gender identity or sexual orientation, they send a dangerous message: that some people are deserving of equal rights, while others are not.

For every victory, there has been relentless pushback:.